patching...
Update: Don't miss the Cinnaminson news and events you care about - sign up for Patch's daily newsletter. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

After Split Vote, Police Admin Gets Township Car

Substantial revenue can allow Mickey King, the public safety director, to use a township-issued car—not just for emergencies.

 

Township committee members were split Monday night over the decision to issue a company car to Public Safety Director Michael P. King. But in the end, the top police administrator will get one.

Committeeman John Rooney, who is the liaison to the police department, said revenue is up nearly 75 percent over last year and it won’t cost more than $5,000 for King to have the car.

Or else, Rooney said, he’d pay the overage out of his own pocket.

“Our accolades for [King] have just been absolutely beyond words,” Rooney said.

The praise for King didn’t stop with Rooney; all township committee members agreed he’s turned the police department around, however some were unsure if changing township policy to allow the car was the way to go.

Deputy Mayor Anthony Minniti was skeptical about the vehicle issuance saying, “I can easily say yes as easily as I could say no.”

“The next clamoring is why are we buying cars instead of cops,” said Minniti, admitting the backlash from the public could be substantial.

Rooney said there is already a car available for King, and George Haeuber, interim township administrator, said the only extra costs would be gas and maintenance.

Committeewoman Kathy Fitzpatrick wanted to see more hard numbers before voting one way or the other. Fitzpatrick abstained from the final vote.

Committeeman Ben Young said he didn’t have a problem with King having a car but questioned the departure from policy.

Mayor Don Brauckmann said the issue “is not as easy as it sounds.”

“I have a tough time drawing the line from one employee to another when it comes to this benefit,” Brauckmann said.

Currently, township committee members are interviewing for a new administrator, but the idea of a company car had not yet been discussed, according to Fitzpatrick.

Rooney called the issuance of the car “appropriate” for King and that “he’s earned it.”

King started last summer as the public safety director after the early retirement of former interim police chief Steve Fowles.

Lt. Tim Young, who was present at the committee meeting, told members he doesn’t “have a bad word to say” about King.

Rooney brought up the idea for King to have a company car initially since King is needed in the township way beyond the normal 9-to-5 schedule.

King said it would make his life easier and his job “more effective” and “more efficient.”

“I’m coming (for emergencies) whether you give me a car or not,” King said.

The vote passed 3-1 with one abstention from Fitzpatrick. Brauckmann voted no.

Stay with Patch for updates.

 

Don't forget to like Cinnaminson Patch on Facebook to get town happenings right in your news feed.

Related Topics: Cinnaminson Municipal Building, Cinnaminson Police Department, Cinnaminson Township committee, and Michael P. King

Bowtie

6:46 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Im sure he does a great job. This is not the day and age of wasteful spending anymore. He should respectfully decline the car. Gas and maintenance for all future cars......no thanks. Tax payers should have had a vote...buy me a car,insurance,gas and maint to

Reply
Comment_arrow

Community Service, Job 1

10:22 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

We elect them to run the town, to the best of thier abilities. Public office is a thankless job. You can rarely satisfy everyone. I you were at your job and you were continutly beat up for you decissions or not popular votes it would harrassment or bullying. The committee or any committee can not vote the way you think they should all the time. We should manage with out best judgement, and go withthe facts we have. Could you imagine if the public having to vote on every issue, what a circus that would be.

Eddy Iannuzzi

7:41 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

He was hired knowing it wasn't a 9-5 job. What happens when the car needs to be replaced? Who pays for that cost? Bad precedent set. And who abstains? If you don't know all the facts, you owe it to the people that put you into office to vote no until more facts are given.

Reply

DOUBLER

8:17 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Kath, Ed is right on this one, one way or the other you have to vote. to abstain is taking the political way out so you can say, "I didn't say this or that". I'm not saying one way or the other but you need to vote, I hate it when ANY politician abstains, on any issue you need to grab as much info that you can at that time to vote. It's Up or Down, Kath not "I don't know". That is why you are in office to REPRESENT!

Reply
Comment_arrow

taxpayer

10:49 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Cinnaminson politicians do not have backbones....i am not at all surprise she abstained...we as taxpayers deserve a better answer from out committee

Ray Budden

8:24 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

The vote should have been "no car". No offense intended to Mr. King, if he has been doing a great job for Cinnaminson, that is fantastic. That is what he was hired to do, we didn't hire him to do a below average job. When did "Thank you" and a Paycheck become not enough??? Thank you Mayor Brauckmann for making the only sensible vote in this taxpayer's mind. Elected officials need to think about the population they represent, the tired masses that drive their own cars to work each day to pay their bills and their taxes, and give us a break with all the spending. And Eddy is correct, you shouldn't abstain from a vote unless you have a conflict of interest. If you don't have all the information you need to vote yes for an increase in spending, you vote no and you can re-vist the issue later when you become more informed. It is easier to give something later than it is to take it away.

Reply

Stew T

8:42 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Another do as we want with the tax payer's money! Mr. King was hired knowing that there was "No Car" doing a great job...excellecent that's why he was chosen! He makes $80,000/year and collects a pension and can't afford a car, seriously?

Reply

Bill C

8:46 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

If this is a compensation issue, then pay him for the good job and let the taxpayers see the cost.
Handing out cars is not the way to use taxpayers money in this situation. Mr. King should be able to expense any out of pocket costs to the township to eliminate any personal cost burden.
Young is right here! Why do we want to change from current township policy's ?
Rooney, "if King has earned it"....pay him and put it in his taxable paycheck !

Reply

Deborah Stevens

9:05 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Bad move...so what are they going to give him next year, when they say he's doing a great job, a house in Cinnaminson so hes here all the time....He gets a salary to do the great job...and he even said he would be here no matter if they gave him a car or not...

Reply

Anna

9:10 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

He won't move here, the taxes are too high.

Reply

Zuzu

9:10 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Boy they love spending our money. If there is such a surplus in revenue who about giving it back to the tax payers. Thoughts like that never cross their mind. Well I know who I'm not voting for. This is setting a bad precedent.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bill C

10:10 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

totally agree !!! I know who not to vote for next time...

Zuzu

9:13 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

"Or else, Rooney said, he’d pay the overage out of his own pocket." I hope they hold him to that.

Reply

Boss Hogg

9:26 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

This is outrageous! He knew the day he took the job that he wasn’t getting a car. What about the other township employees who do a good job? What do they get? Trips to Disney on our dime? And Fitzpatrick abstains???????????What a wimp move! Shame on Rooney for even bringing this up? Mr. Conservative. What a joke!

Reply

Jason Furrer

9:42 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Who was issued the car before him? Why was it just sitting around unused anyway? Is this a marked township car? Does it have emergency lights and sirens? It seems as though they want to give him all the benefits of a police chief, even though the committee decided to eliminate that position.

Reply

Ellie A.

10:31 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Now hold on here. Some of you are criticizing Ms. Fitzpatrick for abstaining from a vote? You think she should vote no because she doesn't have all the information? That's EXACTLY why she should abstain. It's a smart move because she doesn't have all the information to make a decision one way or the other. Why does it have to be no?
Ms. Fitzpatrick, that was the right move. Will this meeting be on television?
Secondly, we need to support our police officers in town. Mr. King has done a fine job and one of my neighbors is friends with a police officer here and she said he just sings his praises. I personally have never met him before but I have seen him.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Christina Paciolla

10:46 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Ellie,
The executive sessions are not televised, just the regular meetings on the third Monday of the month.

However this issue was on the public agenda. It actually was on the last agenda too.

Christina

Comment_arrow

Zuzu

11:01 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

I'm all for supporting the police dept not boosting individual's perks. The guy may be a saint that's no reason to give him a car paid for by the taxpayers.

Comment_arrow

dajoepa75

11:33 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

How is it all the other voting members had enough information to make a decisive vote? Wasn't the same information shared with everyone? Abstaining is a non-vote but it really doesn't matter. I don't remember last time this committee put something up for a vote and voted no. I don't understand why this car wasn't negotiated during the contract process. Unless it was and was shelved until the uproar over the position quieted and now it can be added in. Ellie, is there ever a time you disagree with our township administration and side with the taxpaying residents? Why wouldn't you want your money be put to better use or give us all a taxbreak. I don't understand the need to always go along even when the majority don't agree. This is the first comment section where almost everyone from all sides is in agreement. But doesn't matter; whatever is put up for vote is always passed. Wouldn't have mattered if Ms Fitzpatrick voted no anyway.

timmy

10:46 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

I bet they could care less what you all think

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bill C

10:52 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Agree with you timmy...the only thing we can do is vote the right people in office.

agent itchy

11:03 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

i totally support a brand new car for our public safety director. i couldn't imagine a more fiscally conservative expenditure than to buy a shiny new sedan for a six figure bureaucrat.

gotta love the hypocrisy of local republican politics. when i lived in mt holly it was the dems who spent money like drunken sailors - in cinnaminson it's the repubs.

can't mr king drive his own *#@! car?

Reply

Luke Murry

11:09 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Hey guys! I keep you safe from dangerous insects and wildlife on a daily basis. Scary wasps and hornets, home destroying termites, you name it- I'm on the frontlines... My personal car is kind of beat up though, I really fancy a new one... Since I'm doing such a good job protecting you, would you all mind throwing some taxpayer dollars my way? I could really use a new ride!

Reply

DOUBLER

11:44 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Hey Elllie A
we'll remember that if you ever want to run for office, that any tough issue you would just vote to abstain. No you are wrong again, there was plenty of information on both sides of the issue and if not , then how can you vote on other issues? Up or down, that's all, you vote your conscious with the info you have, or believe in at the time of the vote on any matter, unless you have a conflict of interest.

Reply

Sean McDonough

11:51 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Question. He got approved for the car does this mean he now gets to expense all the gas used now as well? I mean maintainence is paid for as its a twp owned vehicle. Why not just stipend him X dollars a month to use his own car. Im sure that will be cheaper in the long term.

Reply

Gas gobbler

12:20 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Mr. King drives from Mercer County everyday...that's a big Gas Bill. You people sure don't sound like fiscal Conservatives to me!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Billy Pilgrim

12:47 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Hi Gas Gobbler, for what it's worth, costs accrued for travel to and from work from your place of residence are not tax deductible or reimbursable.

Comment_arrow

dajoepa75

12:49 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

For those who drive an hour one way to work and back and have to use own car no gas or expense voucher, it's part of the job. Use of a car during work hours, sure makes sense. Driving to and from job, absorb expense as part of the job. The salary is a decent amount of money.

Bowtie

12:49 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

A car with all the expenses paid...by the tax payers...this is why I hate politics. Cant wait to see my new tax bill.

Reply

Richard Magee

1:09 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Wait until he finds our that This PERK is TAXABLE by the IRS! Company Cars etc., are counted as Income by the I.R.S. EVEN if the Twp pays the taxes to the IRS that too than becomes Income! Former Chief Tom Adams Never abused his Office nor perks! ~Rick Magee, FL det. ret.

Reply

Richard Magee

1:19 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

I did not mean my writings as a slam or to be misinterpreted against the Director. Obviously he is doing a good jiob. My recollections of Cinnaminson Twp. is one of being isolated from the constant political medlings by my Chief of police, who the Citizens loved as did we all. May God Bless Chief Tom Adams, Sgt. Tom Lillagore and all of my "Brothers" who have predeceeded me from this earth. May they All rest alongside of saint Michael the Archangel. ~Rick Magee, FL Det., Ret.

Reply

Jan

2:21 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Rick your recollections sound like a time when life was great, but that is not how things are run around here now. The new Director takes his direct orders from the Twp. Committiee Members. John Rooney is on his way out the door, what an exit with this generous expenditure of our tax dollars. The Mayor (Don) votes "NO" brilliant with his candidacy up. Kathy Fitzpatrick votes with the typical abstain vote, and Young votes yes (but fought so hard to keep the car out of the deal origiinally) the classic is Minniti saying and I quote "I can easily say yes as easily as I could say no." It is mind blowing, the article goes even further to say that they are interviewing for a New Adminstrator? If he is doing such a great job why interview new candidates or offer a car? Great job as always Patch.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Christina Paciolla

2:44 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Jan, I think you're a little confused with the wording. The township committee is interviewing for a township administrator—not a new public safety director. There is no administrator in place since Mr. Seneski left. There is only an interim.

Maureen

2:25 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

He earned it? I have nothing against the man or what he has done. But he is getting paid to do his job. The reward is his paycheck and his job, benefits, etc.... Are we in the business of handing over cars if employees do a good job? We are going to be giving out lots of cars. I think a plaque or public accolade is enough.

Reply

Richard Magee

2:47 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

My advice to all Residents of Cinnaminson Twp. Beware of a Council or Committee that Removes a Chief of Police to only replace it with a Civilian under "their Control". Corruption follows. I guress Good Ol' Boy Politics is not just in the South. Payoffs take many forms, albeit perks, Bonusses or vehicles. Jan wrote that they are interviewing for a New Administrator. That's Interesting. Maureen, I agree with you too. Who does one have to know to get the job? Me? I am too darned Honest! I can still pass Polygraphs! ~Rick Magee, FL Det.,ret.

Reply

JustALocalGuy

2:51 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Sounds like a waste of taxpayer money and a way to pay someone more without having to put it in the budget for approval.

Reply

Michael Makinson

3:08 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

I have a company car for my job, For the benefit of using it for personal use my employer withholds a set amount of money every pay period as my share of the cost of the lease, insurance, gas, maintenance, etc . Personal mileage use of the vehicle is considered taxable income by the IRS. Will the director be charged for the personal use miles he puts on the vehicle? If he is involved in an at fault accident during personal use will he be required to pay the insurance deductible?What policies did the committee put into place for the non-township business use of the vehicle? Too many unanswered questions for me. The director is not a sworn police officer He has ZERO police powers. He is an administrator. How many after hours public safety emergencies has he had to respond to so far?

Reply

Michael Makinson

3:13 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

The River line runs from Mercer County and stops in Cinnaminson and Riverton. Let's just issue him some tokens. It will be cheeper, he still gets a ride to work on the tax payer dime and it is more environmentally friendly.

Reply
Comment_arrow

taxpayer

11:09 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

this is the most brilliant comment of all...great suggestion Michael! you couldn't of said it beter, 'it will be cheaper' and 'its more environmentally friendly'

Comment_arrow

Mark

9:27 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Public emergency service workers alread get to ride all NJ Transit, PATCO,and SEPTA (if in Philly) lines free of charge as long as you ahve your identification on you. So there is an even larger savings! :-)

dajoepa75

3:52 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

A great idea and I'll even buy the first week tickets. I have five tickets right now will stop at station get five more for round trip.

Reply

dajoepa75

4:15 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

75% revenue is up over last year? Where did this new windfall come from and where is it going? 75 percent really? A year ago revenue was down due to all the appeals on reassessments. How much does that calculate in actual dollars?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Richard Magee

11:20 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

dajoepa75: All States and government entities (i.e) Cinnaminson TWP) must maintain a Second set of Books showing all expendature and Investments and Income. It is called the Comprehensive Financial Report (CFR) It is Federally Mandated! This "Book:" is secretive and many politicos will deny having knowlege of it's existance but it is REAL! Try and... No DEMAND a Copy! See how far you get. You will be lableled as a trouble maker. Back in 1938 we had a Gov.named Hoffman who created both a Sales and Wage Tax on N.J. Residents. The 'NJ Taxpayers Assoc.' was formed by a man named Canning, I think. Unbeknownst to the Gov. they had in their midst the State's Accountant with those books. When they confronted the Governor in Trenton, it took two days and Both Taxes were cancelled by Gov. Hoffman. See? I am not stupid afterall. See if Cinnaminson will comply with your request. ~Rick Magee, Fl., Det. ret.

Roger Hare

6:01 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

I was at last nights meeting. There has been a requirement that a car be available for Mr. King's use while on the Job. For instance, if he is in the office and gets called on to perform official business outside the office. So therefore a car has been made available for his use during business hours. The issue at hand is after hours lets say 2:00 AM when there's a hurricane. Should we expect him to use his own vehicle to get in the office. That's the question. I am inclined to say say No. I would expect that as a township we would want him to have a reliable way of getting back to Cinnaminson if needed. Since We are already paying for maintenance and Insurance on this vehicle the only thing in question last night was the cost of the additional gas. For the record Ms. Fitzpatrick abstained because she wanted to know the cost involved before making a decision.

Reply
Comment_arrow

dajoepa75

7:05 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Two things, I was essential personnel for government agency at one point. The ice storm in early 1990s; we were required to drive our own car and be in on midnite shift. Drove from jersey to phila when storm started. Stayed two days in motel at government expense, drove own car home. Second, if the costs weren't available at meeting that Ms Fitzpatrick abstained then how could other members make an informed decision without knowing costs beforehand?

Comment_arrow

Ric

8:00 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

I understand Mr. King's supporters claim that King walks barefoot on water while singing the Star-Spangled Banner. Apparently they feel there is no other person on the planet as qualified as him. What do I think? I am not so sure anyone can be as qualified as they claim. It sounds like a lot of back scratching going on.

But I agree Mr. King should not be expected to use his own car doing official duties such a hurricane. I am sure the police department can loan him one of their cars in times like that. But no way should the township provide him a car to drive back and forth from his home. He lives quite a distance away. How soon until King demands a chauffeur driven limousine? If he is going to commute with this car, the very least King should do is reimburse for personal usage of the vehicle and that would include driving back and forth to work.

The police department suffered deep cuts. It seems like adding salt to their wounds by giving King such a deal as this.

Comment_arrow

Community Service, Job 1

3:08 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

Roger, it apears that you are the only one who gets it. Mr. King must travel to Cinnaminson outside if his daily work schedule for Events, Town and Police Emergencies, Storms, ect. During Irene was in the EOC Command Post, many only got four hours sleep in two days so that the residents could be safe and home waiting it out. Some have everything to say, but provide no community service. Opinions do not get anything accomplished, cooperation, and assistance does. Mr King is a professional and very polished individual, for the $80.000 we are paying him, he should have a vehicle assigned to him. A person of his calaber is easly worth $125.000 plus. It is proper to absain if you don't have all the facts to make a decision, Why vote "yes or no" when you don't have the facts?

Comment_arrow

Ric

3:50 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

@community service. I really think you are lowballing Mr. King's worth. $80,000 or $125,000 is chump change after I read your words. Why I think we should be paying the man ten million dollars a year. I cannot believe he accepted $80,000. He also should have a private helicopter with pilot on duty 24 hours a day.

Ruth Mays

9:11 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

The statement about revenues being way up in interesting. So maybe there was not a good reason for a tax increase after all? Perhaps some of that excess revenue could have been used to hire back some police officers. I keep reading about houses being broken into, but rarely see a police car on the street (except for the Moorestown ones that have their headquarters right down the street.)
Ms. Fitzpatrick, just why is it you do not have enough information? Are the guys keeping things from you. Makeing sure you get enough information to cast an informed vote is your job.
As for the citizens who voted this group into office and now have complaints- when you keep doing the same thing, you will keep getting the same result.

Reply

Bull Pitt

10:11 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

How much information does one really need? It's a car! He lives in another County! Most of our Police Officers are on call during hurricanes, and other emergencies as well. Should we give them all a car too?? Also King is not a Police Officer, he can't have a police radio in his car, can't have police lights or a siren! Why does he need a a township vehicle? Also with his commute, he has a much greater chance of getting in an accident, then any lawsuits would be on our tab! I'm sure he's doing a fine job, so what. So do all of the officers, as they always have. So now, Mr. King will drive a township vehicle to and from work, from Mercer County, Monday through Friday, fill up his tank where the other officers fill up the Police cars, and drive on our dime! Fiscal conservatives my butt. And of course Mr. Brauckman votes no, someone has to look like they are looking out for us, and might as well be the one who's up for election. Same crap, different year. Goodbye Mr. Rooney, enjoy your promotion, or whatever your excuse was for not running for office again. We can't blame you, no one wants to work with these people, why do you think there is no other candidates?

Reply

Bill O'Connor

11:25 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

I believe the revenues up 75 % that Mr. Rooney is referring to are citation revenues issued by the Department for motor vehicle violations etc.

Reply

dajoepa75

1:33 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Sylvia, read "Bull Pitts" comment at 1:06 on corresponding article. The car usage is being paid by the 75% increase from motor vehicle violations and courts costs, the increase in tickets by the department are paying for the head of the department's car usage. Let's increase the violations by 150% and give funnel that money into more free car usage. As far as the last comment, are you saying less tickets were written because the former COP lowered the moral and productivity so badly no one wanted to write tickets?? Seems that last comment was just an add on to rehash last election.

Reply

Donkey Kong

3:04 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Christina, this article does not mention what kind of car he will be given. He was using an older Crown Vic, however, now there is a brand new Dodge Charger (with a Hemi I believe) parked there. Please advise.

Reply

John Obuchowski

10:53 pm on Monday, August 13, 2012

Christina, A new Dodge Charger is a reliable car that can go from point A to B. A "Used Taxi" as I was issued in the 80's was a "Tow Job". I carried a large "Fire Extingusher", not for public safety, but mine. At that time, I was Second in Command
on call 24/7. How degrading, being called out at 2:00am & towed 2:15am., more times than I can remember. The retired members refer to that as the "Dark Ages"
Are we still in the "Dark Ages" ? When your out at night, see how many Verizon, Comcast, Fire, EMS,EM, PS&G, Maint., NJSP, Prosecutors, Investigators, and other corporation & executive vehicles are parked in town on call 24/7. Our Township
Committee hired Dir. (Chief) King to be the "Top Boss" of the CPD. He is our Director of the CPD. The Twp. buys cars, eguipment, & gasoline on State contract prices w/o tax, and are self insured. I hope I never see any representative of this Twp. on National TV, AOL, Patch, Facebook , etc. looking like they just got out of a trash dumpster. Sorry, if I offend anyone, I lived in the "Dark Ages" I know better. It's time for the residents, business owners & Twp. Committee to stop the
180 issue of "I was hoodwinked, I didn't know, mislead" I personally agree with the members of the township Commitee that voted yes to give Director King who as the leader of the CPD is on call 24-7 and should have a reliable vehicle.I know I've been there !

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The Cinnaminson Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks