Emotions Fire Up Over Brush Citations
Cinnaminson's Department of Public Works' brush citations don't sit well with some, but a committeeman says it's the only way to get people to adhere to the rules.
With spring arriving early this year, many Cinnaminson homeowners took advantage of the mild weather to spruce up their yards. But that yard work came at a price for some.
Residents, including many on Erlington Drive, who hauled brush into the street outside of their designated collection period received citations from the township.
Count Janice Stonaker among those rubbed the wrong way by the citations from the Department of Public Works (DPW) superintendent, Frederick Turek. She received one on March 21, as did many of her neighbors, Stonaker said.
“I’ve lived here for almost 26 years and I’ve never seen anything like this,” she said. The citation was a first notice and did not include a fine.
It’s not the brush rules—which stipulate a time period for when brush can go curbside—or the schedule that upsets Stonaker, but the tone of the citation and what she feels is lack of communication about the regulations.
“It’s really a harsh, threatening citation. They list all of these consequences possible—a summons to appear in municipal court, putting a lien against my property for work performance by the DPW,” she said. “But before they send such a threatening letter, they better make sure they have all their T’s crossed and I’s dotted.”
The missing crosses and dots in this case, Stonaker said, are two-fold. She pointed to the outdated Cinnaminson DPW website, which still showed the 2011 collection schedule as of Monday evening. By Tuesday morning, the schedule changed to 2012.
Stonaker also said paper notifications were lacking. A mailer from the township didn’t catch her eye and she tossed it.
(Three parts of the mailer sent home to residents can be clicked on at right.)
“They really need to notify residents before sending out a citation like that,” Stonaker said. “Why not use the townwide notification system to remind people of the rules before the pickups start, so people don’t violate them? It's easy enough, they use it to remind people about Cinnaminson Day."
But Committeeman Ben Young, director of public works, takes exception to the idea that residents aren’t informed about brush rules. Cinnaminson and Young himself have gone to great lengths to inform residents about the rules, he said.
“Two notices went out, one in tax bills and another mailed. I’ve talked about these regulations at township committee meetings for years. But people don’t listen. There are times when they’ll put out brush a day after the pickup, then it just sits there,” Young said. “We’ve been trying to enforce the rules, but it seems like people won’t listen until they get a citation.”
The DPW’s Turek did not return a phone message seeking comment.
Cinnaminson isn’t enforcing the brush rules on a lark, Young said. The state Department of Environmental Protection is cracking down on stormwater regulations and Cinnaminson has to stay compliant, which means enforcing municipal stormwater rules. When brush is left curbside for too long or on top of drains, it hampers stormwater management, Young said.
It's also a matter of sheer volume. In recent years, the annual brush haul increased from 7,500 yards to 35,000. With that much brush, the rules must be followed, Young said.
“And frankly, I’m amazed people don’t take more pride in their property. It doesn’t look good to have piles of brush out in front of your house for a month,” the committeeman added. “Who wants that? I would think people would have more pride in their property.”
Cinnaminson’s brush pickup schedule operates on a four-week cycle in March through October. The township has a map delineating four zones, with each zone getting a pickup during a specific week of the month. Resident may put their brush by the curb, but not blocking storm drains, no more than seven days in advance.
Now that she knows the rules, Stonaker said she plans to fall in line. Cited neighbors are now hauling their brush back to the curb in anticipation of their neighborhood’s April 2 pickup.
“You know, (Cinnaminson DPW) went to the trouble of driving around, looking for violations, just a few days before we were allowed to put the brush out anyway. Why not just warn people of the rules first?” she said. “My beef isn’t with the rules or with the township committee—they have a job to do. I just wish the township would think about notification and the tone of the citations first.”
MJG
7:48 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Maybe the township needs to revise these rules, especially in the spring and fall. Thankfully the residents take pride in their properties and are anxious to clean them up. The township should consider multiple pick ups in spring and fall. If they have enough time to drive around town issuing summons, they could have just picked up the brush.
BLJ Callahan
9:56 am on Thursday, March 29, 2012
Thanks to Township Public Works, GOOD JOB! Three days after brush pickup in Cinnamin Hill II, a wood pile was placed at curb in our neighborhood. Today that pile is removed from curb by resident thanks to Public Works action. Isn't it easier to save such detritus somewhere in residents' yards than to see piles on holidays when families visit? Isn't that a better solution than increasing taxes for additional pickups?Public Works schedule has worked well for 45 years of my experience; we simply need to follow the schedule.
judie
7:58 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
I feel the same way MJG. We live on Hilltop and the Cul-de-Sac on our corner had brush there since November 2011. The township trucks just kept riding right by and didn't pick it up until early March 2012.
Lauren Burgoon
9:36 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Hi Judie, Just a note that Cinnaminson doesn't collection brush in November, December, January or February, according to a notice posted on http://www.cinnaminsonnj.org/public_works_info.htm
judie
9:38 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
I understand that. But they did come around after a horrific storm to pick up limbs people had drug out to the curb but never picked up the limbs our neighbor had in the street. I just didn't understand that.
Kelly
8:29 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
agreed. we actually got a summons because we had a tree almost completely fall down from a storm and my husband put it all to the curb.. he had to then clean it all up into a trailer and dispose of it at the township building.
Committeeman Anthony Minniti
9:00 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
As this issue inspires strong emotions on both sides I think it would helpful if I provide some additional insight.First and most important, brush service is continuing at the same level as always.There is no decrease in service or pickup dates.The only change is the enforcement of a rule that has always been in existence though rarely enforced; that brush only be placed crubside the week of pickup.The primary reason the town must now enforce this longstanding rule is because of recent NJDEP Stormater regulations and designation of The Pompeston Creek as a Class A protected waterway.One aspect of these regulations require regular streetsweeping as well as keeping debris out of storm drains.When brush is placed in the street for long periods of time there is an increased risk that the drains clog.This places the town in violation of NJDEP regulations and puts our taxpayers at risk for hefty fines.Quite simply, the town has lost the flexibility it once had to "look the other way" when residents leave brush in the street for 3 or 4 weeks at a time.NJDEP issues aside, the town has always receieved a large number of resident complaints about neighbors putting brush in the roadway, from both a safety and property maintenance standpoint.
Committeeman Anthony Minniti
9:15 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Residents often complain that brush in the roadway creates a negative appearance and violates our property maintenance ordinances. More seriously, brush in the street creates an obstruction in the township right of way causing safety issues for pedestrians and vehicles alike as they are forced toward the center of the roadway around the brush piles. Obviously, as brush must be placed in the street for pickup to occur, the town must find a balance that allows for efficient pickup service while minimizing the safety and aesthetic issues associated with brush in the street. Restricting residents to their alloted week is the best way achieve this balance. With regard to notice, the town has gone to great lengths to educate our residents to this new enforcement initiative. As with any new rule, there is a transition period as we adjuste. The "citations" issued would be more accurately described as correction notices. If brush is removed from the street (it can be placed on the curb as long as it's not in the street) then there is no fine associated with the violation. Compliance is our only goal. I am pleased that Patch has taken the time to write this article as it provides one more avenue for educating residents about our responsibilities. Needless to say, if residents have any questions, they should not hesitate to contact Fred Turek at Public Works or Pam McCartney at the Township Complex.
MJG
8:20 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Mr. Minniti, a couple of things please, the article states that brush pick up has increased by almost 5 times. Don't you think that it may be time to revise our policy for more frequent and on time pick ups? Also, when Frank Turek wrote "correction notice in front of me, my brush WAS on the curb and not in the street. Mr. Turek told me it could not be there. So could we please clarify this point.
Ross Chatham
9:35 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Seems to me that if we just drained the Pompeston Creek this wouldnt be as much of an issue.
S L
9:42 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Sorry Ross, but I'll have to disagree with you here. I'm not sure about you but where I am, I have neighbors that put out their brush whenever they feel like it and do not adhere to any schedule whatsoever. This creates a drainage and flooding issue because if there is a heavy rainstorm the brush gets swept into the sewage drains, clogs them up and now we have flooding on our hands. I for one am happy that the township is FINALLY enforcing the brush ordinance. My only problem is that the brush pickup is late many times and this is an issue that needs to be resolved as well. If the township is citing residences, then there should also be some sort of oversight on timely pickups as well.
Janice
9:43 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
I think Mr. Young misses the point.....the people who are putting the brush out do care about their properties, that is why they are cleaning them up from the winter. I I was home when my citation was left......how hard would it have been for the superintendent to just knock on my door and inform me of my violation, instead of leaving a threatening citation.
By the way, my neighbors and myself who all take pride in our properties were cited on March 21, 2012. When I finally was able to find the brush schedule, we were legally allowed to put our debris out on March 26, 2012......we were cited for being early by 5 days! I know spring is a very busy time for the public works department, doesn't the superintendent of public works have more important tasks to perform then to ride around and threaten the very people that pay his salary! What is happening with this town?
Phil
9:49 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
5 days is still 5 days Janice and as Mr. Minniti states above, there are specific times when you can put it out for curbside pick-up. You were early and got the citation. Yes, the Superintendent probably could've knocked, but the citation would still have been written for record keeping.
S L
9:51 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
I'm glad their starting to warn people with fineless citations. I have one neighbor who puts out their brush, without fail, a day after brush pick up every year now for 8 years!!! Its sooooo annoying and makes our street look like trash. A few months ago, after the last brush pickup, the put a pile of twigs at the curb!! I was so tired of seeing it day in and day out (for months) that I just cleaned it up with my sons. It was a really good lesson for them on this is how you DON'T want to treat your home...curbside included!! Oh for those who are upset that they don't know the schedule....here is a really simple solution: get on the phone, call the township and ask.
Anna
4:58 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
OMG, I totally agree. I drive a school bus and it irritates the heck out of me that the already limited road space on some roads because of people parking in the street instead of their driveways...are additionally limited because of brush and leaves that are out for weeks at a time. Then once it is picked up they put out more brush or leaves the day of or day after.
Marilyn McMenamin
8:40 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Thank you! I swear people can't read in Cinnaminson. We get the schedule every year and it is simple to follow. I see people put brush out the day after it is picked up and it sits for a month. They also put grass clippings out in the summer. Grass clippings are not picked up. They should be bagged.
Phil
9:56 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
More people complaining when the information has been sent to every resident multiple times over the years. I've seen this notice at least twice a year and saw it at Cinnaminson day as well. I hope they keep up the enforcement for the leaves come fall. I would say a lot of it isn't necessarily the homeowners, but the landscaping companies they hire. I know that's the case in my neighborhood, they put stuff out weeks prior to our scheduled pick-up dates and it ends up all over the place.
I would like to make a suggestion that the weeks rotate each year. My area is always the last week of the month (group 4) and in November and December for leaf pick-up, that's a little rough to be doing it that late in each of those months every year not to mention it's holiday time as well.
Janice
10:03 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Does the reverse work......when they are supposed to pick up our debris and it sits there way past the date they are supposed to come, are we allowed to cite them? What I am speaking about, is leaving debris in the streets (and ironically mine was the leaves they didn't pick up in the Fall) such a crime that warrants such a response? It seems to me that this town seems to be fixated on appearances rather than substance. Mr. Young speaks about people don't realize until they get a citation, doesn't that speak to the fact that they aren't communicating effectively to the people of this township. Like the article said, before the collections start, put a township wide message out on the phone system informing people that if they don't follow the collection rules, they will be cited and MAKE SURE that the website if updated with the correct information before you cite people. That doesn't seem to be too hard to do.
Phil
11:07 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Yes, it does. When my brush or leaves make it to about Tuesday of the following week, I contact Public Works either through a phone call or email and they usually respond and the items are out of there within 24 hours. The one thing I do know is you have to have it out there the Monday of the week they are scheduled to pick-up because they could come any time. There really should not be a reason to put out a message as it's code that's been on the books for years and they've been sending out the same pamphlet every year that I've lived in the township. I will agree on making sure the DPW website is up to date, however, with the latest schedule.
Marilyn McMenamin
8:43 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
They always pick up the scheduled time in my area. Brynwood Square - the first week of the month. Lived here 30 years and it's always the first week. Just READ when you are scheduled. NOT HARD.
Committeeman Anthony Minniti
10:06 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
@Janice, to be clear, the Superintendent of Public Works does not drive around looking for violations and writing citations. Properties in violation of the regulations are reported by the police, public works employees, code enforcement office, and neighboring property owners. With regard to the citation, it is a notice to correct and as it is an official document the verbage is standard legal form. It is not anyone's intent to "threaten" anyone. It is meant to inform the property owner of a violation as well as what happens if the condition is not corrected. Again, compliance is the only goal. With regard to property maintenance and Committeeman Young's comment, I think we all take great pride in our homes and properties. That's one of the main reasons Cinnaminson is such an attractive community. That said, there is an ability to maintain and improve our properties while complying with NJDEP regulations and this ordinance. Remember, the only restritction is that brush cannot be placed in the street until your neighborhood's alotted week. Brush can be kept anywhere else on your property until your week. You can haul brush to public works and dispose of it at no cost if you don't want to keep it onsite. I'm confident that once residents become familiar and comfortable with this rule we will be pleased with the enhanced appearance and safety of township streets. And, of course, that we're doing our part to comply with NJDEP's mandate to protect our waterways
Janice
11:18 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Tony, while I appreciate the job that you and the other council members do, when did we go from a friendly town to one that has to cite people for putting their brush out a few days early with legal verbage? Don't you agree that not having the correct information on your website was a mistake on the township's part. Most people I know plus all the younger people in town are more apt to go to the township website. I think the two problems here are not enough effective communication to the people who don't have the time to go to township meetings (which is the majority of the people) and no give or take. When my brush isn't picked up on the EXACT date, I don't call the township because I understand that there might be mitigating circumstances like weather, etc. Well when I put my brush out 5 days before the schedule, shouldn't that same respect be shown to me. There has to be a little give or take, not so rigid. I think the thing that surprises me is that instead of just the superintendent riding around, we have all these other people who we pay the salaries of reporting back on not what their jobs entail but instead reporting back about who has branches out in the street before they are allowed. I think that is a waste of their time and if they have nothing else to do, which I suspect is not the case since all the township workers and police I know work very hard, then that is a big problem and a waste of our taxpayers dollars.
Jeanne
10:24 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
I am very glad to see these rules being enforced. On narrow streets, the piles of brush are a driving hazard as well as looking sloppy. And please don't say we haven't been informed of the rules. They are on the township website, and come in the mail.
Ric
10:41 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
I very much appreciate the DPW for its street sweeping. I just wish they would schedule it on a day we do not put our recyclables out. The sweeper has to swing around the cans and misses a lot. By the way, in addition to the township sweeping my street, I also sweep in front of my house. It makes the property look better.
Does the township have rules about conditions of sidewalks? There are many well-kept sidewalks in this town but there are some real nasty ones that need repair. The sidewalks in bad shape bring down the well-kept look of their neighbors.
Phil
11:09 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
I've actually had them come around the week our brush is scheduled to be picked up and it hasn't been picked up yet. A little more coordination would be a good thing but I'm not sure how easy that is since every part of the township has some type of collection going on each day.
ask a question
10:47 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
I am personally uphauled my Young's comment that we don't take pride in our properties and shows you the mentality on Township Committee. People who clean up are the ones with pride Mr. Young, I don't think you would appreciate a neighbor who did not clean their lawn. Since we have a committee man on here answering questions, I would appreciate some insight to the public works operation. Isn't public works usually busy around this time with snow removal ?? Being it was such a mild winter, what were they doing other than snow removal ?? Couldn't they have been out picking up the brush ?? Or is maintaining the parks now a priority since I see them constantly there....
John M Walker
1:04 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012
You are not uphauled, you are appalled...
Committeeman Anthony Minniti
10:57 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
@'ask'; I will be happy to re-state my policy regarding comment on the articles. I do not engage in debate nor will I conduct Q&A sessions on blogs, comment sections, or on the internet. On occasion, I will sign on to make a clarifying statement if I think it provides insight to the subject of a published article. The other instance where I will comment is if intentionally misleading information is being posted by anonymous "sources" and is causing unnecessary concern and confusion among residents. In that case, I have a responsibility to ensure that the correct information is being provided. Outside of those situations, the only appropriate forum for general Q&A is at our public meeting where you stand up, state your name, address, and question for the record and I will be happy to answer your question. Your question and my response will become public record and all residents have the benefit of our interaction. When I came onto Committee in 2002, we expanded public comment portions in both our regular and executive sessions and our regular meeting continues to be televised on Comcast cable access channel 28. Cinnaminson has long been a leader in transparency and every resident has the protected right to stand up, speak their mind, and question Committee on the 1st and 3rd Mondays of the month at 7:30pm. I hope to see you there.
tomas
12:50 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
I will forward this notice to all the trees and bushes in my yard letting them know when they are allowed to break. Thanks!
FbS
1:16 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
I am just happy that the township takes the brush away.. Imagine living in an area that does not do this.. Like where we came from over the bridge. Its everyone for themselves and no one helped the residents by removing the brush.. We had to remove it ourselves or pay someone to remove it.. Just be happy with what we have people.. I am
Laura Lynn
9:21 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
For once I have to agree with Frank. (LoL) Enjoy the fact that you can drag your brush to the curb and someone picks it up for you! And trash! And bulk trash!! (wistful smile) I MISS those days! Have you ever had to load dripping smelly maggoty garbage into the back of your vehicle and haul it to the dump?? God I miss the lovely people who picked up my brush, trash, and all kinds of crap off my curb. Right now my Christmas tree is in my back yard waiting to be burned... if it ever rains. Stop whining and be thankful people!
Silvia
1:26 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Just follow the rules and this wouldn't be an issue. The problem is that people put out brush whenever they want and leave it there for weeks or months without caring about our waterways or the appearance of the neighborhoods. Kudos to the twp for taking steps to try to correct this problem and thanks Tony for clarifying the article.
RL
1:49 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
If Cinnaminson DPW could actually stay on the aforementioned "brush schedule", then residents should adhere to the rules. But when collection is behind, as it generally is, residents show very little motivation to hold up their end of the bargain. It's a team effort.
vincent3403
1:59 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
There's blame on both sides. Follow the schedule issued by the township; and, DPW, try to stick to the schedule given to residents. It doesn't help if residents put out their brush within the allotted timeframe and then another few days are tacked on because of late pickups. Especially if there is significant rain and the brush makes its way down the street towards the drainage areas. If there is a backup that results in a few days of delay I think that would be known by DPW and the next section to be picked up could be contacted to delay putting out their brush until backup is cleared (especially if bad weather would relocate all that debri).
Committeeman Anthony Minniti
3:36 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
@RL, There are two main reasons that brush pickup falls behind schedule. The first is due to weather, which is obviously out of the Township's control. The second reason is far more impactful and will hopefully be addressed through our new enforcement initiative; Our residents cause significant delays by placing brush out within days (and sometimes hours) of their street having been picked up. In those cases, our crews will often double back and re-pickup a road or section that had just been cleared. This is incredibly inefficient but our crews often visit areas more than once in an effort to ensure the roads are cleared. It is anticipated that if residents are committed to following the proper schedule, the delays in pickups we've seen in the past will be minimized.
vincent3403
4:21 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
If the delays in pickup are due to residents putting out their brush late wouldn't it be easier to force compliance by not picking up those who are late and issuing a warning as was done for those residents who put the brush out too early and were asked to put it back on their property. The instructions state that brush must be out no later than 7AM on Monday of collection week. If the brush is not there at 7am then those residents are violating the ordinance and backing up the rest of the collections for those who have followed the ordinances. Give them a warning and request they take it to their property until next pickup, Anticipating compliance isn't going to solve the problem. If you're going to warn early birds then you must also warn late comers.
Joe
4:14 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
I always try to follow Township "Rules", so I for one am pleased they are finally taken some type of action. After all, this is what we pay for is it not? For them to do their jobs....right? I have seen neighbors put debris out after the pick up in our area only for it to sit until the next scheduled pickup. Keep up the good work!
Anna
5:02 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
I am just wondering why Cinnaminson can't have pickups 12 months depending on the need. I believe that Palmyra picks up year round.
Bill O'Connor
5:21 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
This policy was put in place over 12 years ago when I was in office. It is clearly frustrating to have a street cleaned up of brush or leaves and within hours after the truck passes your neighbor is putting something out that is going to sit there for a month and if it is a five week cycle longer. While I haven't seen the language or the tone of the citation, it is right to go forward with keeping the streets as clear as possible. Maybe the message needs to be softer. As a community, it can start to look trashy real quickly if not monitored. My only suggestion would be that it be a nine day window for ahead of your week instead of seven. This will give you the weekend before your scheduled pick-up to also get your brush and leaves to the curb. One last note to Anna, you can't have brush out twelve months a year due to the need to pick up leaves which can't be mixed with brush. Also, to plow snow your roadways need to be free of brush and leaf piles.
Phil
5:35 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Bill, I thought we could put brush/leaves out the weekend at the start of our pick-up week, like after noon on the Friday before or something like that and that you have to have it out by 7 AM Monday morning? I can find the 7 AM time for latest curbside on the DPW site just not the earliest the items can be at the curb.
craig schoenberger
6:52 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Everyone should be very thankful that our town even picks up brush removal curbside. There are many municipalities in Burlington County due to budget cuts that do not pick up brush anymore. I am sure following a few rules and regulations due to Department of Enviromental Protection Laws and Township ordinances, this slight inconvenience should not be a problem for anyone. If there is no brush pickup here by our DPW, maybe traveling to the Burlington County Landfill in Florence Twp. and being charged $15.00 per ton might be a better option for all the residents. I suggest putting your curbside debris out on your designated weeks. Craig
craig schoenberger
7:17 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
It would be great if enforcement was also cited for cleanup on the Pompeston Creek. Water flow is virtually stagnant in areas and homeowners along the Arbor side definetely do not clean anything up in the creek which stops the flow of water.
ask a question
7:23 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Residents, wake up and smell the roses. This very committee ticketed a number of small businesses in town last year along with the shop I go to (Long's), do you really think they would hesitate to ticket you for putting your branches out on the street !!! Courtesy is dead people, Cinnaminson is now mirroring other towns like Evesham and adopting a "you will do what we tell you to do" attitude. Mercy on all of us....
Mary Beth
7:50 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Ask is soo right. Do whatever you want people. Service stations feel free to have 20 junkers in your lot after receiving countless "courtesy" request all which went ignored, especially your favorite eyesore Longs Auto. Residents put your piles of brush out in November or whenever you like. Mix all yoour brush and branches together too. Whatever, this is Mayberry ya know! How about” NO”! I know that word hurts your fragile sense of entitlement but tough cookies. How about you follow some of the simple rules of our society. It’s not that difficult and the township is not asking that much. Just follow the rules! End of story is right!
will smith
7:24 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
For goodness sakes people, just put your brush out when you are supposed too! End of story.
bob andrews
8:10 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
@Mary Beth, you must not live in Cinnaminson because if you think Long's is bad you should take a closer look at the shop next to the Fire Department on Cinnaminson Avenue or even Meineke, now that's an eyesore !!! I am surprised that township officials are harrassing residents about brush when there are businesses like Meineke that look like they should be in Camden !!!
Mary Beth
8:32 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Bob, I think a bunch of them are looking bad again. I only mentioned Longs because Ask a Question did and I noticed cars are piling up again since I pass it almost every day. I think you are right and some of the service stations including the ones you mentioned need to be revisited again. It just seems as if this brush issue seems time sensitive because of the time of the spring clean up season approaching and the storm water regulation stuff if I am reading correctly.
Thomas p
9:21 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
@marybeth. You see 20 junkers at longs? Isn't that a exaggeration ? Why drive the best repair shop out of town . Some of us don't have new cars and having long's in town has been good for me.
Bill O'Connor
9:36 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
@Phil actually as I understand the ordinance, it is one week before your scheduled pick-up, meaning the Monday before your week. Pick-up in our area was to start this Monday 3/26/12 so the earliest that I could put it out our brush was 03/19/12. My suggestion was to move that back two days and to tone down the citation language. As with anything some level of flexibility needs to exist by both the homeowners and the Township. It is a great service to have but we do need to be mindful of a schedule so it doesn't get out of control. Also, I see a lot of grass clippings at curbside and I am not sure we pick clippings up. That should be clarified.
Phil
8:45 am on Thursday, March 29, 2012
I would agree, if allowed under the new watershed rules, to move it back 2 days as that would allow 2 weekends. DPW doesn't pick up grass clippings and they should be bagged according to the flyers and website. Thanks for clarifying the put out date.
Janice
11:02 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Wow....so let's see what I learned today.....I learned that since the township sent out two mailers it is okay that they didn't update their website. So for those of us who rely solely on getting their information off the website, we are out of luck. It is pretty hard to read something that isn't there. Then I learned we should be thankful for a service that we pay taxes for. Maybe I am wrong but I always thought that the township's main objective is to provide people with basic services before they spend money on other things. So if they are going to cut anything out of the budget, I would hope it would be these other expenditures first. Lastly, I learned that this law has been in effect for over 12 years and sometimes is enforced and sometimes isn't during those 12 years. Well if the township did what I suggested in the article and had the phone system call everyone and tell them that from now on this will be strictly enforced, then the citations wouldn't take people by surprise and there wouldn't have been a need for this article!
this article.
Committeeman Anthony Minniti
6:00 am on Thursday, March 29, 2012
I have received several inquiries about how/why this ordinance now must be enforced so I'm going to give some background.Former Committeeman O'Connor is correct, Cinnaminson has had 1 week restriction "on the books" for years. As it was a town ordinance only, enforcement was flexible & at our discretion.In the last 6 years, Cinnaminson was hit with a "double barrel"of NJDEP regulation.First, the Pompeston (at the urging of the Pompeston Creek Watershed Association) was designated a Class A protected waterway meaning it was endangered. Concurrently NJDEP passed new stormwater regulations called MS4. Because nearly all of Cinnaminson drains to the Pompeston, & because PCWA was successful in having the Pompeston designated "Class A protected", we were ordered to comply with "Tier A" standards (the most restrictive). Over the last several years the Town has been phasing in mandatory ordinances of MS4. As brush pickup is the service most impacted, we've been educating residents through announcements (at every televised meeting), mailers (in every tax bill), and explanations each year like the recent mailer. The bottom line is we have no choice but to begin enforcement of face fines from NJDEP. Again, this in not the town's choice, but a state mandate and due largely to the efforts of PCWA and former their presidents Dey, Lord, and Pierson. I am including a link to the model ordinance the town was compelled to adopt.
http://www.nj.gov/dep/dwq/pdf/Tier_A/Chapter%207.pdf
Cindy Pierson
5:51 pm on Friday, March 30, 2012
I have been told that I can only write facts that can be documented or I have to make it clear that what I write is my personal impression. You should do the same Mr. Minniti. If you are going to write about the stormwater laws, please give accurate information! I urge everyone to visit the link that you posted, and I defy you to show me anywhere on the nj.gov/dep site (or anywhere else for that matter) where the PCWA is the reason Cinnaminson has to comply with the Tier A standards. It is a state law, that EVERY town has to comply with. Cinnaminson was not targeted! And I would appreciate it if you would stop making inflammatory statements (that are bordering libel) based on information that you are apparently just making up out of thin air. Your comments are filled with misinformation, and a number of outright lies. It is my opinion that you are trying to damage the reputation of the PCWA because of some personal grudge or vendetta against me and the organization. Please start using facts, not fantasy - People have a right to like us or hate us, but they should be allowed to form their own opinions based on information that can be documented and verified, not the nonsense you have been allowed to post. [For the record, only the tidal portion of the creek has been designated a Category 1 protected waterway-not "Class A"-and it doesn't mean "endangered"-LOOK IT UP!]
Committeeman Anthony Minniti
6:09 am on Thursday, March 29, 2012
To be clear, we've had to adopt the entire package of ordinances. The section pertinent to "yard waste" can be found on page 10 of 18. I would invite those with questions to contact current PCWA president Cindy Pierson for her feedback. Her organization was instrumental in this effort and should be taking an active role in educating our residents about these restrictions. Again, the town does not have the flexibility it once had. It doesn't matter whether we agree with these regulations. We are mandated to comply with the NJDEP. I don't believe the requirement to place brush at the mandated time is unreasonable and I do believe it won't be a problem once residents understand the how and why this is necessary
AnoninCinna
7:13 am on Thursday, March 29, 2012
Ah....Mr. Minniti is passing the buck to the Turtle Lady. Well played, Mr. Minniti, well played.
Reality Check
8:10 am on Thursday, March 29, 2012
Facts are Facts. Don't Hate the Player.......Hate the Game!
Committeeman Anthony Minniti
9:58 am on Thursday, March 29, 2012
@Anonin,I believe all residents have a right to know the genesis of regulations they find unpopular.If these regs have their roots with the governing body, I will provide insight into our thought process and desired goals.If the regs come from outside agencies,residents have the right to know who has written the law so they may ask similar questions.The fact is all Cinnaminson residents need to be educated about the activities of the PCWA.They are more than a volunteer group that cleans the river & puts on seminars for school children.Under their most recent presidents, Lord & Pierson, they have engaged in environmental political activism at the County and State levels. While the Committee was unable to prevent the NJDEP classification of the Pompeston (resulting in mandatory & burdensome municipal regulations), PCWA has continued to pressure this Committee to pass local ordinances that would have tremendous impacts on all homeowners, particularly those that live within 150 feet of the Pompeston.Committee fought back attempts to regulate the fertilizers residents use on their lawns,sealers they use on their driveways, where & when they can wash their cars, disposal of pet waste in your own yard, requirement of expensive rain garden drainage on new home construction/additions & even an ordinance requiring NJDEP approval of sheds or additions if you live along the creek.The brush pickup ordinance is a minor inconvenience compared to what Committee succeeded in turning back
We the People
12:55 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012
Let me get this straight. The environmental activist group: The Pompeston Creek Watershed Association (PCWA) is responsible for the NJDEP brush requirement and also attempted to force the township and us residents into all these regulations after lobbying NJDEP to categorize the Pompeston Creek as a Protected Class 1 Waterway? And yet political adversaries of township officials call this passing the buck!
So where is the normally outspoken Turtle Lady to defend her group for their activism? Or how about she commends the township for their compliance with the very regulations her activist group fought so hard for? No Blog column, no offer to provide insight via private email, no comment what so ever! Only crickets! We The People want answers! You see, Environmental Activist Groups like the PCWA seem like cute do-gooders but they wind up costing us taxpayers a lot of extra time, money, and inconvenience complying with their litany of regulations. I know “We the People” all want to protect the environment but most of this groups recommendations seem ridiculous. Keep fighting the good fight township committee.
vincent3403
1:45 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012
There are two ways to look at this. Let's take out all the other restrictions that have resulted from PCWA's actions and look strictly at brush pick-up, the crux of this story. The town ordinance has always had a one-week restriction "on the books" for years. As it was a town ordinance only, enforcement was flexible and at our discretion. Why was the ordinance still on the books if the town is not going to enforce it? And, what's the problem with enforcing it? Take the new requirements out of the equation, allowing brush to "float" down to the drainage systems because the ordinance is not enforced or residents are not in compliance, can back up the drains allowing water to pool on the streets (happens where I work in Camden all the time where storm drains are clogged with debri and streets are flooded after heavy rains). Everyone here started out saying it's a requirement just do it and how it makes our streets a mess when the rules aren't enforced. Now it's the fault of the PCWA because the rules have to be enforced? It was mentioned that not following rules also give DPW additional work to back track and pick debri backing up the whole collection cycle. Seems the ordinances should have been enforced to begin with not at "our discretion". This is strictly about brush pickup.
Committeeman Anthony Minniti
2:52 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012
@Vincent, you're confusing the issue so I will attempt to simplify; Some have expressed the desire to have more flexibility in the enforcement of brush pickup. When pickup was governed by local ordinance, the town was the enforcement agent, hence we had the ability to consider something like the recommendation of former Committeeman O'Connor and adopt an informal 2 day grace period (9 rather than 7 days). Due to the NJDEP classification of Cinnaminson and the Pompeston, combined with the mandatory MS4 regulations, the town has no ability to be flexible. The ordinance mandated by NJDEP sets a strict 7 days limit. For the record, I never said following the limit was wrong or that I was necessarily against it. There are very valid reasons for complaince and I've outlined those above. That said, I also understand those who feel there should be some flexibility in our enforcement efforts. The point is the town no longer enjoys the option of flexibility because the time frame is mandated by the NJDEP. PCWA is mentioned because their advocacy of Cinnaminson being designated "Class A protected" has resulted in the loss of flexibility the town once enjoyed.
Cindy Pierson
5:58 pm on Friday, March 30, 2012
lies and misinformation. email me at turtlelady527@comcast.net and I will send you the links for every aspect of the state requirements. If you like, I can also send you copies of the twp's annual stormwater reports (I got my copies via an OPRA request). I welcome everyone to come to PCWA meetings - 4th wednesday of each month - and see who we really are and what we really do. Please try to refrain from forming an opinion and posting nasty & negative comments until after you get the facts - not minnit's version, not my version, but the actual facts of the situation from the state and county.
Silvia
10:03 am on Thursday, March 29, 2012
Gotta love those environmental activists.
Cindy Pierson
9:22 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012
I tried to not chime in again, but Mr.Minniti is wrong about a number of things.I was told by the patch editor to make sure I only write facts that can be documented & verified because alot of people who read the patch believe that everything that appears is the absolute truth.I obeyed-Others apparently don't have to follow the same rule. 1)Yes, the PCWA did support the STATE's decision to name the creek a category 1protected waterway- because of the highlevels of substances in the water that are harmful to humans & the presence of endangered species The designation prevents development that would increase pollutants & provides resources & funding opportunities for protecting the creek & creekside properties.Contact me for a copy of the report on the 11 year water quality study that the PCWA did-it is not what the state based the determination on, they used data from their own study and from Rutgers.We tried to present the report to the entire community, but the committee only gave us 15 minutes at an executive session (after postponing for months)& didn't allow questions from the public.Contrary to Mr.Minniti's coments,we have presented stormwater education at Cinnaminson Day, at the New Albany School Science night, at the 4 checkpoints along the Walk the Walk route, at all of our cleanups & work sessions & dozens of other events.Just because no one from the committee attended doesn't mean we didn't present the information.
Cindy Pierson
9:52 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012
Category 1 protected waterway, not "Class A"-the designation applies only to the tidal portion of the creek, not all of Cinnaminson- and "loss of flexibility" a used above means "not allowed to do whatever we want with no regard for the consequences to the public and the environment". The PCWA has offered to work with the township many times, only to be blown off, quite rudely in some instances. The twp donated money to "Make a Splash" - we had 4 educational stations at the event (no committee members attended).We offered to help retrofit detention basins, to help the twp meet the stormwater requirements- at NO COST to the twp-we were ignored. We have invited the committee members to our meetings, and no one responds.It took years before they would allow a link to our website from their site's community organizations page-I'm surprised they haven't removed the link. My personal impression is that rather than take responsibility for problems, they blame other organizations or try to distance themselves from a situation.They are so sure that they are absolutely right about everything, and try to bully any one who says otherwise into submission.I urge everyone to do their own research, send OPRA requests for information, watch replays of committee meetings or get copies of meeting minutes,ask questions, demand factual answers - and then decide who is telling the truth and who isn't.
Sarah
12:38 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012
Just a little Thank You to the guys out in my neigborhood yesterday. They did a great job picking up the brush and debris.My street looks great.
Cindy Pierson
2:57 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012
Sorry I didn't respond quickly enough for some of you - I teach, and have to wait until I get home from work to take a look at the patch comments. Now that I have scanned the comments, I am going to follow my own advice and type my response, have someone proofread it, and then I'll post it. I would rather take a little bit of time so that I can address specific comments with accurate information that can be documented, instead of just lashing out or being accused of trying to scapegoat anyone. Please be patient.
AnoninCinna
3:03 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012
Mr. Minnitti - you are essentially passing the buck to the PCWA. The PCWA didn't write the strongly worded threatening "warning". The PCWA didn't have outdated information regarding brush pickup on their website. Nor is the PCWA responsible for the lack of notification or clarity of information to residents.
Please Mr. Minnitti. Your smoke and mirrors aren't fooling anyone.
Steve S
3:31 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012
Dear Cinnaminson Residents,
After being informed two times with your tax bill and special mailers and being told numerous times on TV during televised meetings, we would like to remind you one more time of our brush policy. Now gosh darn it, PLEASE, PRETTY PLEASE WITH SUGAR ON TOP, PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES OR WERE GONNA HAVE TO ASK YOU NICELY AGAIN. Then if you still don’t listen, were going to have to ask you nicely to go see our Judge and talk it out some more over tea and cookies.
Love with extra special huges and kisses, Representative AnoninCinna.
Get Real you cry baby liberal. Just put out your brush when you’re supposed to, not when you want to.
vincent3403
3:47 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012
Mr. Minniti,
I don't think I'm confusing the issue at all. There are ordinances in place for a reason. Pretty much everyone on here seems to be in agreement that the ordinances need to be enforced to have a smooth flow in the pickup. It's great that we can be flexible but it seems to create more work and, if most residents are complying, then all should be. By following the rules, it lessens the work for DPW and keeps the streets clear of debri when it shouldn't be there. It allows the drain system to do what it is supposed to do; clear the water from the streets. What's so confusing?
vincent3403
3:52 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012
Mr Minniti, as an aside, I think the issue has been complicated by attempting to explain at length PCWA's involvement with all of this. You yourself in earlier posts on Wednesday cited that the ordinances should be followed to keep Cinnaminson streets clean and not have duplicate work down by public works. I'm not sure why now we have to be upset by losing our "flexibility" in following the ordinances. That choice of "flexibility" is what causes problems when some residents are giving leeway and some aren't based on arbitrary decisions. We all need to be treated equally as residents, right?
vincent3403
4:09 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012
Except that PCWA's actions have nothing to do about the issue should the ordinances be enforced for everyone for the betterment of our community? If they should then PCWA is a non-issue unless you feel we should "bend the rules" when it suits us. And then who gets to have that flexibility and who doesn't. It's sets a bad precendent when we pick and choose what rules to follow; I'm a democrat and even I know that. And even though environmentalists may be a bit too passionate in their causes it evens out those who could care less and use the streets, parks, etc as their own private dumping grounds for their trash and waste. Otherwise we'd be living near a cesspool instead of a creek.
Cindy Pierson
4:45 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012
I would like to politely point out that Mr. Minniti is mistaken. I have uploaded several PDF documents that will show that the PCWA is not responsible for the things Mr. Minniti accuses us of. Also check www.state.nj.us/dep and looke up the NJ Municipal Land Use Law and read article 12! Note that the laws and requirements that the committee fought were from the state, not the PCWA. And even though they fought, all of those laws were adopted by the committee and made part of the township code. I find it interesting that the committee seems to be proud that they fought against regulations whose purpose is to protect the health and safety of residents. I have not read any of the citations, but I get the impression that people were upset by the tone and wording more than the citations themselves. And for the record, I support the township's yard waste policy - when debris of this type gets washed to the storm sewers, it creates all kinds of problems - from street flooding to non-point source pollution. Perhaps if the township had taken advantage of the offer to host neighborhood stormwater education programs, people would understand the situation more clearly, and would have been on the lookout for the brush pick-up schedule to arrive, or known where to look for it. And in spite of attempts to discredit both the PCWA and me personally, we would still be happy to work with the township to provide these free programs
Office Mouse
5:11 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012
The Public Works website was not wrong, they were late changing the heading "2011" to "2012. The schedule has been the same for 12 years. The Township also made a contribution to the Make A Splash Foundation last year supporting Stormwater Education. Thank you Mr. Minniti for taking the time to communicate with our residents.
AnoninCinna
5:22 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012
Dear Steve,
FYI, I actually agree with the ordinance. I appreciate efforts to keep my neighborhood clean and free from debris, as well as keep our stormdrains clear to reduce backups.
What I don't agree with is Mr. Minnitti blowing smoke by bringing the PCWA into this rather than address the actual issue itself: brush pickup. Not to mention his usual tone of hubris and condescension.
Mr. Hankey
7:24 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012
I would like the town to address the real issue, enforcing the ordinance to keep squirrels from moving into my brush. It is hard to remove them, especially with all the prickly sticks from the rose garden.
joe1`
8:04 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012
This local ordinance is simple and straightforward.
Superintendent Turek and the DPW should also abide by the law. It is a Federal offense for the DPW to place the violation notice and brush schedule directly in mailboxes without postage - they can be fined for each offense.
Lauren Burgoon
8:16 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012
From talking to Janice, it appears as though the notices were left inside front door handles, not mailboxes. I don't know if that happened with every notice. Janice, if you're still out there and I am recalling that incorrectly, feel free to weigh in.
joe1`
8:18 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012
Not mine. Was in the mailbox.
Lauren Burgoon
10:49 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012
Gotcha, thanks. I didn't realize you had received one.
Cindy Pierson
11:24 am on Sunday, April 1, 2012
Where has everyone gone? We the People, Silvia, Reality Check - Did you do the research, visit the links and find out that someone's comments were untrue and uncalled for? I guess the name calling and sarcasm aren't as much fun, or as easy, when the target of the venom counters with courtesy and facts.
Lynn Amatrudi
9:02 am on Monday, April 2, 2012
Committeeman Anthony Minniti and Fred Turek - I would like to have someone interpret what the brochure says that you hand out:
Brush Pickup: Brush is picked up between March and October. To insure pickup of brush (during the appropriate season) it must be at the curb no later than 7:00 A.M. on the Monday morning of the collection week scheduled for your area. Brush and/or leaves can only be placed curbside for collection one week prior to the beginning of the week of your scheduled pickup. Failure to comply may result in fines assessed. At the end of the season, your last bush pickup will be the week in October that you are scheduled, not the end of the month.
I am specificially looking at the 3rd sentence.
Thank you
Phil
9:52 am on Monday, April 2, 2012
Lynn, hopefully this will answer your question. The 1st group for April had to have their brush out there by 7 AM this morning. This means the earliest they could have their brush out for pick-up was 7 AM on March 26. Those that had gotten cited had brush out for pick-up for this week but had it curbside prior to March 26.
Lynn Amatrudi
5:28 pm on Monday, April 2, 2012
Phil,
Thanks for the info - but what I was really trying to understand is that it does say brush and/or leaves - meaning both brush and leaves - hence the word AND - and I was told that my little bit of leaves that was amongst the brush was the reason it was not picked up. I'm just trying to get some clarification since I was told to read the brochure that was circle so nicely for me and that's what it said - brush AND/OR leaves - so I believe what I had out there was OK.... THANKS
Nancy VanTwistern
9:48 am on Monday, April 2, 2012
All I know is....In some areas I have had to drive in the middle of the road to avoid leaves/limbs etc. and when cars are coming the other way it makes it more difficult. ALSO, Since moving here awhile back we have been pleased with the services afforded by the township government! ALTHOUGH, the price IS included in our taxes.......which I hope don't increase much anymore ELSE....................
Bobby
10:29 am on Monday, April 2, 2012
I had a few branches at the curb that the wind blew down.
A large Refuse truck and a backhoe with a front scoop parked in front of my house.
Two men got out and looked at my twigs.
The truck driver got back in the truck and, a few minutes later, walked up to my house and left me a citation.
It would have taken much less time to pick up the twigs, especially since the truck and loader were already there.
Fearing for God knows what wrath, I broke up the twigs and put them in a trash bag.
Couldn't the Township use someone in a car or pickup to drive around giving out citations. I'm just saying...........
Steve S
1:39 pm on Monday, April 2, 2012
Wow Bobby! You broke up the twigs and put them in the trash like you should have in the first place? Wasn't that easy? I'm just saying...........
Long time resident
10:52 am on Monday, April 2, 2012
Its seems simple to me. Since so many people have fire pits, etc...., in their backyards now, it is time to start burning your own leaves and brush like we used to do.
cinnalert
9:06 am on Monday, April 23, 2012
IMPORTANT MEETING ALERT! I have learned from sources that Cinnaminson planning committee will be hearing an application tomorrow(Tuesday) night 4-24 at 7:30pm. The plan for reuse of the Corestates Bank on the corner of Meeting House and Route 130 will be presented. I'm told that former candidate for council, KEN GERTIE is the owner and is FIGHTING against the township requirement for sidewalks on Route 130. PLEASE ATTEND and tell all who are worried about Route 130 safety to come. The planning committee needs to know the people of Cinnaminson support a safer Route 130! It is important that we the community DEMAND Mr. Gertie put the safety of our town and Route 130 first!