patching...
Update: Don't miss the Cinnaminson news and events you care about - sign up for Patch's daily newsletter. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Minniti: 'There Has to be Justification' for Take-Home Cars

The deputy mayor wants committee to look at the policy on a case-by-case basis.

 

Deputy Mayor Anthony Minniti said township committee would approach the take-home car policy as if there was no policy in place at all.

“We’re really going about this in a deliberate fashion,” Minniti said Tuesday. “We’re going through and doing something that should have been done many, many years ago—which is re-establishing the policy.”

The township’s take-home car policy was again discussed at Monday night’s committee meeting but nothing definitive was approved—other than to look at the position, not the person.

“We need to outline those positions,” Minniti said.

Minniti called for a complete prohibition on take-home vehicles; however, the majority of township committee chose to allow it and will just fine-tune the details.

Minniti, who said he’s against take-home cars at all, said he can make a case for the township’s K-9 officer since the dog lives with the officer and has to be transported in emergencies.

The role of the zoning officer isn’t that of a 24/7 responder, so Minniti said he’s not sure a case can be made for that position.

“There has to be a justification,” he said.

A township ordinance calls for no car for any township employee, but personnel policy allows for it. The township revisited the policy last year when a public works employee who was allowed a personal car to take home lived nearly 30 miles away.

The only two stipulations to take home a car in the current policy are the person must be a 24/7 responder and he or she must live within 10 miles of Cinnaminson.

“If the K-9 officer moves outside that 10-mile radius,” Minniti said, “by our policy, he can no longer take the vehicle home. That is where our policy is weak.”

The days of all township employees living local is over, he added.

Cinnaminson Administrator Frank Locantore will meet with department heads in the coming weeks to discuss the topic.

“Then, parameters will be placed,” Minniti said.

Those who have cars and take them home may be subject to a tax retroactive to the start of the current quarter, Minniti said. Law enforcement officials are not included. The only positions affected would be the township’s zoning officer and superintendent of public works.

  • Which township employees, if any, do you think should be allowed to take home an issued vehicle?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Any employee who is issued a car for day to day use
        2 (3%)
    • No employee should be allowed to take a car home
        28 (49%)
    • Only police officers
        22 (38%)
    • The six who can currently take them home
        3 (5%)
    • Other/Tell us in the comments
        2 (3%)
    Total votes: 57
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Take-home vehicles and cinnaminson township

dajoepa75

7:07 am on Wednesday, October 3, 2012

This is a rehash of the prior article; no additional information other than a few more quotes. Instead of talking about this in the public forum (which I wonder why) just get the committee together and come up with a policy. Better yet go back to the original ordinance and revise that instead of these "policies" that circumvent the ordinance established.

Reply

dajoepa75

7:10 am on Wednesday, October 3, 2012

No wonder nothing gets done at the Federal and State levels. If local governments can't sit down and get this one thing done without all the rhetoric how in the world can be expect larger governing bodies to do anything for a much greater population.

Reply
Comment_arrow

John

1:19 pm on Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Oh boy U want them to sit down and figure this out, good luck with that one, we could not even get our tax bills out in time and they blamed it on Burlington County....I finally got mine Sept 25, and the taxes were do Aug 1, can U figure that one out, politics is a good job, just do not tell the truth...

Sick of lies

9:31 am on Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Just give King a car and take away Marshalls and get it over with. This "justification" smokescreen is a joke. And when the new Twp Administrator comes up with who is allowed, the whole committee will be surprised, right? Lol. The newest puppet already has his orders.

Reply

John

1:30 pm on Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Looks like someone deleted my message, I wonder who, do not know why, all I said was the truth about the tax bills being late and they blamed Burlington County, did not get mine until Sept 25 and they were do Aug 1 and U want them to figure out how to chat with each other....who are U kidding, politics is a good job, someone should have told me that....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ric

6:39 pm on Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Hi John, aAnd do not forget, contrary to all rules of business, decency and common sense, if you are late paying this tax, the township will charge you a late fee going back seven weeks before they got around to billing you simply because a loophole allows them.
I will bet you dollars to donuts not one of them in the tax office would ever accept a bill from their creditors which charged them interest before it was duly incurred.
This could have been all avoided if the tax office hired a temp to help get the bills out on time. I hope that the reason they did not hire a temp was just so the staff could rake up OT. It does not take a rocket scientist to stuff a tax bill into an envelope.

dajoepa75

7:09 pm on Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Ric, they asked seniors to volunteer to stuff the envelopes for a few days.

Reply

John Obuchowski

7:49 pm on Wednesday, October 3, 2012

I just filled the survey, Interesting ! 50% of our residents don't give a damm about thier home, family or their own lives. Absolutely amazing, Our first and formost Chief of Police simply stated in the early 70's, "The Twp Committee don't give a damm, the Residents don't give a damm, why the hell should we, they don't want us do our job. Don't answer the phone.

Reply

Bruce

7:53 pm on Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Tax bills couldn't get printed until the county struck the rate. This didn't happen for many weeks after they normally get it out....It has nothing to do with the tax people in the township office. They saved us the problem of getting an estimated tax bill back then...and then getting an adjustment bill now!...Relax!...you can always go to the tax office and pay them money...they will accept your payments and make adjustments as needed.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ric

9:06 pm on Wednesday, October 3, 2012

@Bruce. According to Patch, see link, the county passed the tax rate 8/22 and the townships were notified a week later.

I do not understand why it was the better part of a month later that the tax bills were mailed out.

Of course, I do not understand why they think it reasonable to charge interest from a date almost two months prior to their sending out the bill. That was not the fault of property owners.

http://cinnaminson.patch.com/articles/tax-bills-nearly-finished-says-collector

John C.

2:10 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Why would there even be an issue on the Director of Public Safety's need to take a township vehicle home? His only function is pretty much the police budget and policies and procedures. He took this job knowing full well that it did not come with a take home vehicle as compensation. The value of a "take home vehicle" is well over $12,000.00. If a take home vehicle is so important then the twp should deduct the cost of that vehicle from his $80,000.00 salary. He is not "on call" as a detective or police chief is.

Reply
Comment_arrow

John

2:16 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012

Oh boy, I hope he plans on claiming that as income on his FEDERAL TAXES or will he have to wait for the COUNTY to send him a W-2 form.....either way getting a free car is giving away our MONEY.......How about letting the public works department give out speeding tickets, they give out summons now for people putting out branches before there time but end up coming early....does not figure.....

John C.

2:10 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

For example, a civilian “director” cannot perform police duties including conducting motor vehicle stops, engaging in patrol activities, answering calls for service and stopping or detaining individuals. A “director” may not wear a uniform or badge or carry a firearm, nor may he or she operate a motor vehicle which is equipped as a police car including police band radios. Likewise, they have no powers of arrest and may not issue firearms permits. Further, as a general rule a “director” may not have access to criminal investigative reports, nor may he or she have access to criminal history information. Likewise, such individuals must refrain, unless otherwise specifically directed by the county prosecutor, from directing the investigation of criminal activity. Nor may a “director,” as a civilian appropriate authority, have access to internal affairs investigative files absent a court order. Moreover, a “director” may not examine confidential police reports or other confidential law enforcement documents, nor may he or she access the police department’s terminal for 12 N.J.S.A. 40A:14-152; N.J.S.A. 2C:58-3. 13.

Reply

Margie S

5:21 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Thanks for all that information John, I for one did not know that the Public Safety Director was so powerless. He is nothing like an officer and I think that's where the confusion sets in. I believe it would be a big unnecessary burden on all the "taxpayers" in Cinnaminson to provide Mr King with a car to ride back and forth to work. Especially when he took the job knowing there would be no vehicle. I have to agree with dajoepa75 as well, how long is this going to be dragged out? This local government really needs more time? For what?

Reply

Tom D.

5:40 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

This is just about taking away the zoning officers car and giving a brand new car to the saftey director. This certainly is not what I would call fiscal conservative . Spare us the BS Minnitti. Be what you said when you ran for office, a fiscal conservative. No cars for any employees (except police officers) This safety director is not a officer.

Reply

Lamb Chop

11:03 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

As usual, this committee is all about handing out rewards for being a "good boy", and taking things away from those who speak out against the all-powerful ones. John C. obviously knows what he is talking about, it's been said before, yet there are still people in town who think this guys a Chief of Police. And our Mayor is a Police Officer and knows this, so who is really running this town? I'll give you a hint, (and think of where our new Township Administrator was a Captain). http://www.southjerseylocalnews.com/articles/2012/01/12/medford_central_record/news/doc4f0dc5a295edb431917157.txt

Reply

Bull Pitt

12:06 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012

Wow, thanks for the link Lambchop, kind of explains everything.

Reply

Nancy VanTwistern

8:59 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

Still 'talking' about this car stuff??? How about 'no take home cars' for anyone except those whose jobs require them to 'go at a moments notice' and I don't think the latest new employee comes under that catagory. Enough already, the taxes in this town are putting too many elderly, long term, reliable citrizens into the catagory of the jobless poor........and it didn't used to be that way. No more perks for town employees...........not when it comes off of the back of those who pay their way..

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The Cinnaminson Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks