Saturday Mail Delivery to End, Postal Service Announces
The U.S. Postal Service will end Saturday mail delivery by Aug. 1. How will this affect you?
Calling the six-days-per-week mail delivery business model “no longer sustainable,” the U.S. Postal Service Wednesday morning announced it will eliminate Saturday delivery of mail by Aug. 1.
Post offices will remain open Saturdays and certain items—medicine deliveries and priority and express mail—will be delivered; first-class mail will not.
According to the U.S. Postal Service, continued economic struggles and the increasing use of the Internet for communications and bill paying by consumers led to the decision. The U.S. Postal Service is also the only federal agency required to pre-fund health benefits for retirees, and those costs are escalating quickly.
“Our current business model of delivering mail six days a week is no longer sustainable. We must change in order to remain an integral part of the American community for decades to come.”
Saturday is the lightest mail delivery day by volume and many businesses are closed on Saturdays, according to the U.S. Postal Service. However, many residents receive print magazines and ads on Saturdays in the mail that may be shifted to another day.
A Rasmussen poll on mail delivery in 2012 showed “Three-out-of-four Americans (75 percent) would prefer the U.S. Postal Service cut mail delivery to five days a week rather than receive government subsidies to cover ongoing losses.”
A USA Today/Gallup poll in 2010 found the majority of U.S. residents surveyed were OK with eliminating Saturday delivery. The March 2010 telephone survey of 999 adults revealed people age 55 and older were more likely than younger people to have used the mail to pay a bill or send a letter in the past two weeks.
How will this change affect you? Will you miss getting mail on Saturdays? Vote in the poll and tell us in the comments
I heart Mo-town
9:24 am on Wednesday, February 6, 2013
Since all I get in the mail these days is junk mail and bills, ending Saturday delivery has no effect on me personally. What I don't get on Saturday, I'll get on Monday. The post-office will still be open on Saturdays and packages will be delivered on Saturdays.
I'd be interested to hear why anyone would be opposed to this.
The reason it's being done, however, is another story:
"The U.S. Postal Service is also the only federal agency required to pre-fund health benefits for retirees, and those costs are escalating quickly".
Pundit
10:54 am on Wednesday, February 6, 2013
Why just stop Saturday mail delivery? Why not stop all delivery and require all mail to be pick up at the post office instead?
John
12:56 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013
Oh boy why pay taxes....lets stop there too....better yet lets go back to the horse and buggy day and not worry about oil....good luck
I heart Mo-town
12:54 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013
Pundit -- I'm not opposed to that either - but it is nice to have it delivered. Cutting more days would be OK with me too. It would be a huge hardship for the sick and elderly and full-time work force in general though. Don't get me wrong, I think mail delivery is great. I truly do! Delivering it one day 'late' - as I said earlier - to me personally - doesn't matter.
Since the reason they are cutting, it seems, is due to financial problems associated with health-care benefits for retirees, then removing all mail carriers from working would solve the problem of providing healthcare (or paychecks) to them pre and post-retirement as well. It would save the government a TON of money, wouldn't it? The jobs report would change significantly but, hey, you may be on to something! Seriously though - I really don't think the government would ever fully remove mail delivery - more likely to just bail it out of it's financial problems like it does everything else and keep raising the price of stamps!
Personally, I'd miss mail delivery tremendously - but again - not having it delivered on a Saturday won't be at all painful.
tocman
2:24 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013
pundit........that's a good idea. It's the way it used to be when mail delivery first began. The pony express didn't stop at your cabin every day they went to the general store or stagecoach stop.
Ripped off
7:34 am on Thursday, February 7, 2013
If you lose 16 billion and save 2 billion how do you make up the other 14? Volume?
Sell the usps to fed ex and call it a day
Porterincollingswood
12:41 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013
Fed Ex would start by doing what the USPS should do - make postage related to the cost of the service. Right now, the cost structure doesn't come close to factoring in what it costs to deliver a piece of mail. Of course, people in rural Kansas would be facing a $2.85 stamp price, which would never be allowed to happen given our political climate.
What we have right now is high-population centers subsidizing the inefficient delivery costs to low- / dispersed- population rural America. If UPS or Fed Ex or airlines had "one price regardless of destination" rates, they'd go under in a week even if everyone worked for minimum wage.
This will never change, though. Why? Because GOP congressmen like this form of socialism that their constituents benefit from. They like that the USPS provides many, many high paying jobs in the depressed areas they represent. If you shut down the USPS it would be like shuttering Wal-Mart, the unemployment rate would skyrocket. Who would vote for that if it came down to it?
Plus, old people rely on it, so it would immediately become a national priority to bail it out if push came to shove. Regardless of cost or inefficiency.
It's simple economics - make people pay what it costs and stop relying on others to subsidize your pricing.
All of this is a manufactured crisis.
Phil
10:18 am on Thursday, February 7, 2013
What isn't being stated is that Congress passed a law in 2006 which required the Postal Service to pay forward over the next 10 years 75 years worth of retiree medical benefits. This is the sole reason for any deficit that has been created with the Postal Service. Rolling that law back or removing all together would prevent them from running in the red.
Pete Heinbaugh
12:03 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013
That's an interesting fact, Phil.
Congress is taking these funds and simply spending them. So, our government is now just calling it a USPS deficit, instead of what it really is - a larger federal deficit.
But as a taxpayer, looking at the larger picture, where this deficit amount is assigned is just a meaningless, bookkeeping detail. Our government already receives enough revenue; our government is spending too much; our government needs to spend less. This move saves $2 billion and negatively impacts almost no one. Lets do it. And move on and look for the next $2 billion to cut.
Phil
12:20 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013
Pete I agree, however, that fact is the reason there is a deficit with the USPS. If they removed that requirement, they'd be solvent without any funding from the government.
Pete Heinbaugh
12:26 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013
Phil, I completely understand that.
I'm saying I don't care.
Government can get busy moving things around from one pocket to the other; but it doesn't matter, it doesn't make anything better.
Porterincollingswood
12:46 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013
Pete, saying you don't care doesn't change any of the facts on the ground. The problem is that there is a guaranteed right to mail delivery, for whatever strange reason. The government has to do it.
The problem is, in addition to what was noted above with the benefits payment, is that middle and rural America feel entitles to "cheap" mail.
USPS should run like UPS or Fed Ex. But you can't "get rid" of the organization, even if it makes sense or we'd be better off for it.
Pete Heinbaugh
1:41 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013
Porter, I'm not sure what you're saying to me. You and I seem to be on different wavelengths. Sorry I didn't state point clearly.
Jeremiah Wright
1:43 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013
OMIGOD. How will we survive? Clearly a sign of the apocalypse.