I have been reading the comments posted to the Patch article about the flooding along Fairfax Drive with interest, even posted a couple of comments myself, but feel the need to address some of the posts more in depth. Plus, when you have a blog, you get to put in your two cents worth on whatever you want, so here we go...
Before I go on to address some of the actual comments, I must once again remind people to please try to be civil to one another. Everyone has a right to their opinion, and to post it, but can't we do it without the nastiness and rudeness? And if you are going to be so hostile and offensive, at least have the courage to use your real name instead of hiding behind ridiculous aliases. You remind of elementary school bullies.
It has been said that the homeowners are at fault for buying homes where they did. I must object: my house next to the Pompeston Creek was built in 1889, my family has been here for 6 generations. There was never any problem with flooding until the late 50s when the former farm land upstream was developed - including the Fountain Farms development, Rolling Greens, the industrial park and Walmart shopping center, the Mainline shopping center, the shopping center that is now home to the raceway, the new development on Parry Road, the construction at the Greenbriar property, as well as all the construction in Moorestown. The increase in flooding along the Pennsauken Creek has a similar history- the Shoppes at Cinnaminson are an obvious culprit, but the construction of Cinnamin Crossing, along with all of the development further upstream in Maple Shade and Moorestown, have all played a part in this nightmare. The people who bought property more recently than my family were acting on historical information (can't even really blame all of the realtors for non-disclosure) - in the past, the properties didn't flood - there wasn't documentation yet of the increasing occurrences of high water.
Last year, I sent in OPRA requests for Cinnaminson's annual stormwater management reports for the past couple of years. These are required by the State of NJ's Stormwater Management Regulations. These are the laws that the township points to as the reason for the brush/leaf warnings and citations - the twp is only doing what the state says they have to do, so we musn't be upset with them. Does anyone remember the last time any politician - federal, state, local - ever stepped up and took responsibility for something that was handled badly or turned out to be a bad idea?
People kept talking about how East Riverton is getting attention for their flood issues. First of all, it is the squeaky wheel that gets the grease - I live in East Riverton, and have been whining about the flooding for quite some time. Unfortunately, the mayor has been talking about the Belleview section of town, not the East Riverton where I live. I am attaching a copy of the USGS map from 1966/1967 which shows the two neighborhoods, along with a close-up with a couple of landmarks tagged. The Belleview flooding is coming from the unnamed stream that comes through the Taylor Wildlife Preserve, the Delaware River and from the dramatic increase in impervious ground cover due to the construction of Cinnaminson Harbor. (Do you think the people who live in Cinnaminson Harbor were told that they are living on "made land"? The whole property consists of settled dredge spoils from the deepening of the river years ago- along with all of the toxins and garbage scraped up from the bottom when they dredged.) There has never been any discussion of dealing with or even investigating the flooding along the Pompeston Creek. And why is that the part of town going to be dealt with? As they say in many situations, follow the money... The director of economic development and the mayor have said that with the Rt.130 redevelopment nearly complete, they are looking to obtain similar funding for the revitalization of the industrial zone at the northern end of the township - the former Hoeganaes site as well as the area surrounding Industrial Highway near the light rail tracks. It just makes sense that you won't attract new business and the accompanying tax dollars if the neighborhood has flooding issues. (And I'm sure that it is a complete and total coincidence that the mayor has a business located in the Belleview section that would benefit from the flood issues there being addressed.)
Sadly, at this point, there really isn't a lot to be done for those of us who are treading water. If we were to point the blame where it belongs, we have to take a look at the history of the township's master plan. I am attaching copies of a couple of pages from "The Cinnaminson Waterfront Today and Yesterday" by Joseph H. Taylor, written in 1987, which show that we once had a township committee and a planning board that understood the need for open space and cared more about preserving the environment than about building as much as possible on every inch of land. I am making arrangements to look at the current master plan for the township this week - it will be interesting to see the difference between the 1983/1988 plans and the most recent. With any luck, I should be able to figure out just when exactly the attitude of our local government changed so drastically, and perhaps we'll discover just who sold out the residents along the Pennsauken and Pompeston Creeks.
For anyone who may be interested, I can make copies of the Taylor document - just let me know if you want one. The Watchdogs will also be hosting a showing of "Glimpses of Cinnaminson, Palmyra and Riverton" - a compilation of a local doctor's home movies from the 1920s and 1930s. Anyone who has old photos or documents is encouraged to contact me - an evening of reminiscing could be fun, maybe even enlightening, for more recent residents.
Membership in the Watchdogs is free to anyone who wants to join. Watch for a story from Catherine Laughlin about the group in the near future.